Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Comparative study of dedifferentiated fat cell and adipose-derived stromal cell sheets for periodontal tissue regeneration: In vivo and in vitro evidence.

Huang G., Xia B., Dai Z., Yang R., Chen R., Yang H.

Animal Study on Face & Skin, published in J Clin Periodontol (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
J Clin Periodontol (2022)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
35851962
DOI
10.1111/jcpe.13705
Citations
14

Abstract (original English)

Aim To compare the efficacy of adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cell and adipose-derived stromal cell (ADSC) sheets for regenerative treatment of intra-bony periodontal defects. Materials and methods DFAT cells were obtained using the ceiling culture method and were compared with ADSCs using Cell Counting Kit-8, colony formation assay, surface antigen identification, and multilineage differentiation assays. DFAT and ADSC sheets were prepared in a cell sheet culture medium. The biological characteristics of DFAT cell and ADSC sheets were compared using haematoxylin and eosin staining, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, and immunofluorescence staining. Micro-computed tomography and histological staining were used to compare the effects of the two cell sheets on the repair of periodontal intra-bony defects in rats. Results DFAT cells and ADSCs demonstrated mesenchymal stem cell characteristics. Both cell types were CD29-, CD90-, and CD146-positive and CD31-, CD34-, and CD45-negative. DFAT cells and ADSCs exhibited similar osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation capabilities and colony formation ability. DFAT cells displayed stronger proliferation capabilities compared with ADSCs. Compared with the ADSC sheets, DFAT cell sheets exhibited a higher expression of periodontal-related genes and proteins and greater ability to regenerate periodon

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
RatsAnimalsX-Ray MicrotomographyAdipocytesAdipose TissueAdipogenesisStromal CellsCell DifferentiationCells, Cultured

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research