Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Comparative study of the effects of gold and silver nanoparticles on the metabolism of human dermal fibroblasts

Huang Y., Lü X., Chen R., Chen Y.

Laboratory Study, published in Regen Biomater (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Regen Biomater (2020)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
32296541
PMCID
PMC7147366
DOI
10.1093/rb/rbz051
Citations
24

Abstract (original English)

The purpose of this article was to explore the effects of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) and silver nanoparticles (SNPs) with different cytotoxicities on human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) at the metabolic level. First, ∼20 nm of GNPs and SNPs were prepared, and their effects on the proliferation of HDFs were evaluated. Then, a metabolomics technique was used to analyse the effects of GNPs and SNPs on the expression profiles of metabolites in HDFs after 4, 8 and 24 h of treatment. Furthermore, the key metabolites and key metabolic pathways involved in the interaction of GNPs and SNPs with HDFs were identified through expression pattern analysis and metabolic pathway analysis of differentially expressed metabolites and were finally verified by experiments. The results of the cytotoxicity experiments showed that there was no cytotoxicity after the treatment of GNPs for 72 h, while the cytotoxicity of the SNPs reached grade 1 after 72 h. By using metabolomics analysis, 29, 30 and 27 metabolites were shown to be differentially expressed in HDFs after GNP treatment, while SNPs induced the differential expression of 13, 33 and 22 metabolites after 4, 8 and 24 h of treatment, respectively. Six and four candidate key metabolites in the GNP and SNP groups were identified by expression pattern analysis and metabolic pathway analysis, respectively. The key metabolic pathways in the GNP and SNP gr

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.