Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Comparing the chondrogenic potential in vivo of autogeneic mesenchymal stem cells derived from different tissues.

Li Q., Tang J., Wang R., Bei C., Xin L., Zeng Y.

Animal Study on Cartilage Damage, published in Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol (2010) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol (2010)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
21117872
DOI
10.3109/10731191003776769

Abstract (original English)

to compare the chondrogenic ability of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) derived from different tissues in rabbits' full-thickness articular cartilage defects. sixty New Zealand white rabbits of ordinary grade with a body weight of 2.5 approximately 3.5kg were selected for this study. Six were sacrificed for preparation of deminerized bone matrix (DBM) as scaffold. Fifty-four were used for cartilage defects model. Full-thickness cartilage defect of knee joint was created on trochlear groove at two sides of the femur with a diameter of 4 mm and thickness of 3 mm. All 54 rabbits were randomly divided into 6 groups and treated by autogeneic MSCs isolated from bone marrow, periosteum, synovium, adipose tissue and muscle, respectively. The 6th group was a control group with nothing plugged into the defects. Every three rabbits were killed at three time points, which were 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the operation in each group. The reparative tissue samples were evaluated grossly, histologically, immunohistochemically, and graded according to gross and histological scales 12 weeks postoperatively. We input the scores into SPSS 11.5 software and the analysis of variance (one-way-ANOVA) and student-newman-keuls (SNK-q) test were used to process statistical analysis and find out if the differences between each group had statistical significance. fifty-four rabbits are included in the final ana

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsCartilage, ArticularCell DifferentiationChondrogenesisColoring AgentsImmunohistochemistryMesenchymal Stem CellsOrgan SpecificityRabbits

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research