Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Comparison of administration routes for adipose-derived stem cells in the treatment of middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats.

Du G., Liu Y., Dang M., Zhu G., Su R., Fan Y.

Animal Study on Stroke Research, published in Acta Histochem (2014) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Acta Histochem (2014)
Country
Germany
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
24962764
DOI
10.1016/j.acthis.2014.05.002
Citations
29

Abstract (original English)

Given that adult adipose tissue is an abundant, accessible and safe source of stem cells, the use of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) provides a promising approach in ischemic stroke. The delivery route, however, for transplantation of ADSCs in clinical application remains controversial regarding the time window, cell type, safety issues, 'first pass' effect and therapeutic effect. To determine the optimal administration route in transplantation of ADSCs, we compared the therapeutic effect of the three mainly used administration routes of ADSCs in a middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) rat model. Cells isolated from the adipose tissue of adult rodents were differentiated and characterized in vitro, and further transplanted in vivo by intravenous, intra-arterial or intra-ventricular delivery. The infarct volume, expression of neurotrophic factors and the neurobehavioral improvements were evaluated after the equal dose of BrdU labeled ADSCs transplantation. Our results indicated that the equal dose of ADSCs delivered intravenously were effective in improving the neurological outcome and reducing the infarct volume after ischemic brain injury in long term duration in contrast to intra-arterial and intra-ventricular delivery. At 1-7 days after transplantation, the increased expression levels of BDNF, VEGF, bFGF, Bcl-2, IL-10 and decreased levels of caspase-3 and TNF-α in the i

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipogenesisAdministration, IntravenousAdult Stem CellsAnimalsBiomarkersBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCell ShapeCells, CulturedFibroblast Growth Factor 2Gene Expression

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research