Comparison of the Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Mouse Adipose- and Bone-Marrow-Derived Multilineage-Differentiating Stress-Enduring Cells in Acute-Phase Spinal Cord Injury.
Nagaoki T., Kumagai G., Nitobe Y., Sasaki A., Fujita T., Fukutoku T.
Clinical Trial on Spinal Cord Injury, Chronic Inflammation, published in J Neurotrauma (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Clinical Trial
- Journal
- J Neurotrauma (2023)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 37051701
- DOI
- 10.1089/neu.2022.0470
Abstract (original English)
Abstract Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a serious neurological disorder, with the consequent disabilities conferred by this disorder typically persisting for life. Multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring (Muse) cells are endogenous stem cells that can be collected from various tissues as well as from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs); additionally, these Muse cells are currently being used in clinical trials. The anti-inflammatory effect of stem cell transplantation prevents secondary injuries of SCI; however, its effect on Muse cells remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to compare the anti-inflammatory effects of adipose (AD)- and bone marrow (BM)-Muse cells that were isolated from mice (6-week-old C57BL/6J) following intralesional administration during the acute phase of SCI. Flow cytometry was used to isolate Muse cells from AD and BM MSCs. The percentage of Muse cells was 3.9 and 2.7% for AD and BM MSCs, respectively. To examine cell viability, Muse cells were incubated under H 2 O 2 -induced oxidative stress conditions. Overall, AD-Muse cells exhibited higher viability than BM-Muse cells ( p = 0.032). In enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis, AD-Muse cells displayed greater secretion of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF; p = 0.008), vascular endothelial growth factor ( p = 0.032), and hepatocyte growth factor ( p = 0.016). DNA microarray analysis revealed high
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Host immune determinants of stromal vascular fraction graft survival: Toward a concept of SVF therapy resistance - A systematic narrative review.
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, Chronic Inflammation, Immune Modulation, published in Cell Transplant (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Cell Transplant - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stem cell-derived exosome treatment for acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on preclinical evidence.
Meta-analysis on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Front Neurol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Front Neurol - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) as biomarker in stem cell-based therapies of preclinical spinal cord injury models: A systematic review.
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Tissue Cell (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Tissue Cell3 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Revolutionizing neural regeneration with smart responsive materials: Current insights and future prospects
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Bioact Mater (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Bioact Mater5 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Conductive Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Neural Tissue Engineering: A Systematic Scoping Review of Recent Trends
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 42 on Diabetic Foot, Stroke Research, Spinal Cord Injury, Neuroinflammation, published in Adv Sci (Weinh) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 42
Adv Sci (Weinh)18 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Emerging regenerative strategies for spinal cord injury: exosome-derived mechanisms and therapeutic insights
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, Neuroinflammation, published in Front Neurosci (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Front Neurosci