Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

A comparison between the chondrogenic potential of human bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) and adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) taken from the same donors.

Afizah H., Yang Z., Hui JH., Ouyang HW., Lee EH.

Laboratory Study on Knee, published in Tissue Eng (2007) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Tissue Eng (2007)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
17371203
DOI
10.1089/ten.2006.0118
Citations
128

Abstract (original English)

Cartilage damage has been documented as one of the major problems leading to knee repair procedures worldwide. The low availability of cartilage that can be harvested without causing a negative health impact has led to the focus on the potential of stem cells, which have been transplanted into damaged areas and successfully grown into new healthy tissue. This study aims to compare the chondrogenic potential of two stem cell sources--adipose tissue and bone marrow. Stem cells were isolated from donor-matched adipose tissue and bone marrow, following established protocols. The cells were grown in a chondrogenic cocktail containing transforming growth factor-beta3 (TGF-beta3) up till 28 days, and assessed for expression changes of cartilage markers at the gene and protein level, using qualitative and quantitative methods. Controls were included for every time point. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results showed increases in the gene expression of collagen II in both the cell types that received TGF-beta3 treatment. However, histological, immunohistochemical, and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) assay clearly showed that collagen II and proteoglycans (PG) were synthesized only in the growth factor-treated bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs). These findings support the results obtained in our in vivo comparative study done on an animal model, suggesting that BMSCs are more suitable tha

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipocytesAdolescentBone Marrow CellsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedChildChondrocytesChondrogenesisFemale

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research