Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Comparison between different cell sources and culture strategies for tendon tissue engineering.

Di Giancamillo A., Deponti D., Raimondi MT., Boschetti F., Gervaso F., Modina S.

Laboratory Study on Tendon Injury, published in J Biol Regul Homeost Agents (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents (2017)
Country
Singapore
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
29185297
Citations
3

Abstract (original English)

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an in vitro mechanical stimulation by the use of a bioreactor on an engineered tendon for 7 and 14 days and to analyze the effect of the use of different cell sources: tenocytes, dermal fibroblasts or Adipose-Derived Stem Cells (ASCs), isolated from pig tissues. Histology showed a re-organization of the neo-tissue derived from the three cell populations along the direction of the stimulus. At T7, cells morphology was preserved while an increased cellular suffering at T14 was observed for all cell populations. Tenocytes exhibited higher survival than other cells. A stable immunopositivity for collagen type 1 or 3 at both time points was also observed. In conclusion, dermal fibroblasts and ASCs represent an interesting alternative and in vitro culture with mechanical stimuli may enhance the maturation of a tendon-like tissue.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research