Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

A comparison between osteogenic differentiation of human unrestricted somatic stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow and adipose tissue.

Shafiee A., Seyedjafari E., Soleimani M., Ahmadbeigi N., Dinarvand P., Ghaemi N.

Laboratory Study, published in Biotechnol Lett (2011) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Biotechnol Lett (2011)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
21287233
DOI
10.1007/s10529-011-0541-8

Abstract (original English)

To evaluate the potential of three stem cells for cell therapy and tissue engineering applications, the biological behavior and osteogenic capacity of the newly introduced cord-blood-derived, unrestricted somatic stem cells (USSC) were compared with those of mesenchymal stem cells isolated from bone marrow (BM-MSC) and adipose tissue (AT-MSC). There was no significant difference between the rates of proliferation of the three stem cells. During osteogenic differentiation, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity peaked on day 7 in USSC compared to BM-MSC which showed the maximum value of ALP activity on day 14. However, BM-MSC had the highest ALP activity and mineralization during osteogenic induction. In addition, AT-MSC showed the lowest capacity for mineralization during differentiation and had the lowest ALP activity on days 7 and 14. Although AT-MSC expressed higher levels of collagen type I, osteonectin and BMP-2 in undifferentiated state, but these genes were expressed higher in BM-MSC during differentiation. BM-MSC also expressed higher levels of ALP, osteocalcin and Runx2 during induction. Taking together, BM-MSC showed the highest capacity for osteogenic differentiation and hold promising potential for bone tissue engineering and cell therapy applications.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAlkaline PhosphataseBone Marrow CellsBone Morphogenetic Protein 2CalciumCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCell SeparationCollagen Type ICore Binding Factor Alpha 1 Subunit

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.