Comparison of Effects of Mechanical Stretching on Osteogenic Potential of ASCs and BMSCs.
Grottkau BE., Yang X., Zhang L., Ye L., Lin Y.
Animal Study, published in Bone Res (2013) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Animal Study
- Journal
- Bone Res (2013)
- Country
- China
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 26273508
- PMCID
- PMC4472107
- DOI
- 10.4248/BR201303006
- Citations
- 21
Abstract (original English)
Mechanical forces play critical roles in the development and remodeling processes of bone. As an alternative cell source for bone engineering, adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) should be fully investigated for their responses to mechanical stress. Similarly, the osteogenic potential, stimulated by mechanical stress, should be compared with bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), which have been clinically used for bone tissue engineering. In this study, ASCs and BMSCs were osteogenic-induced for 48 hours, and then subjected to uniaxial mechanical stretching for 2 or 6 hours. Cell orientation, osteogenic regulatory genes, osteogenic genes and ALP activities were measured and compared between ASCs and BMSCs. ASCs could align in a perpendicular way to the direction of stretching stress, while BMSCs did not present a specific alignment. Both 2 and 6 hours mechanical stretching could enhance the mRNA expression of Osx and Runx2 in BMSCs and ASCs, while OCN mRNA only increased in ASCs after 6 hours mechanical loading. Mechanical stretching enhanced the BMP-2 mRNA expression in ASCs, while only after 6 hours of mechanical loading significantly increased the BMP-2 gene expression in BMSCs. Significant differences only exist between ASCs and BMSCs loaded at 2 hours of mechanical stretching. It is concluded that ASCs are more rapid responders to mechanical stress, and have greater potential t
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.