Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Comparison of the efficacy of intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid and lactoferrin in mono-iodoacetate-induced temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: A histomorphometric, immunohistochemistry, and micro-compute

Koca CG., Yıldırım B., Özmen Ö., Çiçek MF., İğneci M., Kırarslan Ö.

Animal Study on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Jt Dis Relat Surg (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Jt Dis Relat Surg (2023)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
36700279
PMCID
PMC9903097
DOI
10.52312/jdrs.2023.901
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

Objectives This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid (HMWHA) and lactoferrin (LF) injections on temporomandibular joint (TMJ) cartilage and subchondral bone in mono-iodoacetate (MIA)-induced temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis model in rats. Materials and methods In this in vivo study, a total of 24 rats were divided into three groups as follows: saline group (Group 1), HMWHA group (Group 2), and LF group (Group 3) including eight rats in each group. The intra-articular injections were administered once a week for three weeks after osteoarthritis was induced. All animals were euthanized 28 days after induction of osteoarthritis, and TMJs were harvested for histomorphometric, immunohistochemical, and micro-computed tomography (CT) analysis. Results There was no significant difference between the HMWHA and LF groups in terms of the histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analysis results (p>0.05). According to the micro-CT analysis, the LF group had the highest mean bone volume fraction (74.9±0.5) and trabecular thickness (0.122±0.002), while the saline group had the lowest mean values (55.0±0.3 and 0.071±0.002, respectively) (p 0.05). Both groups had better healing effects than the saline group in all analyses. Conclusion Lactoferrin has a healing effect at least as much as HMWHA in MIA-induced TMJ osteoarthritis. We suggest that LF m

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Temporomandibular JointAnimalsRatsOsteoarthritisHyaluronic AcidLactoferrinImmunohistochemistryInjections, Intra-ArticularX-Ray Microtomography

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research