Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

Comparison of Efficacy of Intradermal Stromal Vascular Fraction Injection Versus Saline Injection in the Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scar: A 10-Week, Prospective, Randomized, Split-Face, Single-Blind Controlled Trial.

Suh JH., Kim JY., Yoon JY., Lee JH., Kim DH., Jin U.

Clinical Trial with a reported sample of 14 on Scar, published in Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) (2025)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
14
Source database
PubMed
PMID
41413319
DOI
10.1007/s13555-025-01617-6
NCT
NCT07094958

Abstract (original English)

Management of atrophic acne scars remains challenging, and conventional treatments often yield suboptimal or inconsistent outcomes. Stromal vascular fraction (SVF), a cell-rich fraction derived from adipose tissue, has recently gained attention as a promising regenerative therapy. Several previous studies have reported benefits of SVF when combined with other treatment modalities; however, its stand-alone efficacy for atrophic acne scars has not been clearly investigated. In addition, molecular evidence supporting the regenerative effects of SVF in acne scar treatment remains limited. This randomized, evaluator-blinded, split-face clinical trial was conducted in 14 patients with bilateral facial atrophic acne scars. One side was treated with intradermal SVF injection, while the contralateral side received normal saline (NS). Clinical outcomes were assessed using scar counts, Évaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'Acne (ECCA) scores, Scar Global Assessment (SGA) scores, and standardized photography at baseline, 5 weeks, and 10 weeks. Skin biopsies were analyzed via immunohistochemistry for markers of epidermal regeneration (cytokeratin 14, cytokeratin 15, p63, integrin β1) and dermal remodeling (collagen I, elastin, vimentin). At 10 weeks after initial treatment, the SVF-treated side showed a significantly greater reduction in total scar count compared to the NS-treated side (56.4

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research