Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

[Comparison of endothelial differentiation capacity of adipose-derived stem cells and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells from rats].

Fan LJ., Xiao QR., Lin KS., Wang SY., Li ZF., Li CZ.

Animal Study on Face & Skin, published in Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao (2016) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao (2016)
Country
China
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
27687659
Citations
5

Abstract (original English)

Objective To compared the differentiation capacity of rat adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) into endothelial cells. Methods Rat BMSCs and ASCs were isolated, cultured and identified for cell surface markers using flow cytometry. The cell growth curves were drawn by CCK-8 assay, and the cells in active growth were induced for endothelial differentiation following standard protocols. On day 21 of induction, the cells were examined for mRNA expressions of endothelial cell specific markers CD31, KDR, and vWF using qPCR. Immunostaining was performed to observe the expression of CD31 on the cells. The induced cells were also tested for Dil-labeled acetylated low-density lipoprotein (ac-LDL) uptake ability. The tube-forming ability of the induced cells was verified on Matrigel. Results We successfully isolated rat ASCs and BMSCs. Morphologically, ASCs were similar with BMSCs, both having long spindle-shaped and fibroblast-like morphology. Flow cytometry showed that both BMSCs and ASCs had high expressions of mesenchymal markers CD29 and CD90 and a low expression of hematopoietic cell surface markers CD45. CCK-8 assay showed that ASCs proliferated more quickly than BMSCs. The cells with induced endothelial differentiation exhibited increased levels of CD31, KDR, and vWF mRNA expressions and immunofluorescent staining identified CD31 antige

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsBone Marrow CellsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedEndothelial CellsMesenchymal Stem CellsRatsStem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research