Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Comparison of mesenchymal stromal cells from human bone marrow and adipose tissue for the treatment of spinal cord injury.

Zhou Z., Chen Y., Zhang H., Min S., Yu B., He B.

Prospective Study on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Cytotherapy (2013) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Cytotherapy (2013)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
23376106
DOI
10.1016/j.jcyt.2012.11.015

Abstract (original English)

Bone marrow and subcutaneous adipose tissue are both considered prospective sources of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), which can be used in cell therapy for spinal cord injury (SCI). The present study investigated whether human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hADSCs) transplanted into a rat model of SCI would lead to similar or improved neurologic effects compared with human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hBMSCs). hADSCs and hBMSCs were isolated from five adult donors. These MSCs were characterized using flow cytometry, immunocytochemistry, real-time polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Immediately after SCI, 2 × 10(5) hBMSCs or hADSCs were injected into the injured spinal cord. Locomotor function, cell survival and differentiation, spinal cord tissue morphology and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression were compared between groups. hADSCs and hBMSCs showed similar surface protein expression, and hADSCs showed higher proliferative activity with higher expression of vascular endothelial cell growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor and BDNF than hBMSCs. After transplant, both hADSCs and hBMSCs migrated within the injured spinal cord without differentiating into glial or neuronal elements. Administration of hADSCs was associated with marked changes in the SCI environment, with significant increases in BD

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsBone Marrow CellsBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCell DifferentiationCell MovementCell ProliferationCell SurvivalEctodysplasinsFemale

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research