Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Comparison of Microfat, Nanofat, and Extracellular Matrix/Stromal Vascular Fraction Gel for Skin Rejuvenation: Basic Research and Clinical Applications.

Yang Z., Jin S., He Y., Zhang X., Han X., Li F.

Laboratory Study on Skin Aging, published in Aesthet Surg J (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Aesthet Surg J (2021)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
33507247
DOI
10.1093/asj/sjab033
Citations
33

Abstract (original English)

Background Over the past 2 decades, fat grafting has been extensively applied in the field of tissue regeneration. Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic potential of microfat, nanofat, and extracellular matrix/stromal vascular fraction gel (SVF-gel) in skin rejuvenation. Methods Microfat was harvested by a cannula with multiple 0.8-mm smooth side holes and processed with a fat stirrer to remove fibers. Nanofat and SVF-gel were prepared according to previously reported methods, and their structure and viability were evaluated. Then, SVF cells from the 3 types of samples were isolated and characterized, and the cell viability was compared. Results The microstructure of the 3 samples showed distinct differences. The microfat group showed a diameter of 100 to 120.0 μm under the microscope and presented a botryoid shape under calcein acetoxymethyl (calcein-AM)/propidium iodide staining. Scanning electron microscopy analysis showed that the microfat maintained an integral histologic structure. In the nanofat group, no viable adipocytes and no normal histologic structure were observed, but high levels of free lipids were noted. The SVF-gel group showed uniform dispersion of cells with different sizes and parts of the adipose histologic structure. Cell count and culture revealed that the number of viable SVF cells decreased distinctly in the nanofat group

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueExtracellular MatrixRejuvenationSkin AgingStromal Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research