Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Comparison of microneedling and CO 2 laser with adipose-derived stem cells for facial rejuvenation: a randomized split-face study.

delaO-Escamilla A., Valdez-Zertuche JA., Lara-Arias J., Noyola-Pérez A., Villarreal-Martínez A., Chávez-Álvarez S.

Prospective Study with a reported sample of 14 on Skin Aging, Facial Rejuvenation, published in Int J Dermatol (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Int J Dermatol (2024)
Country
England
Reported sample size
14
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39482810
DOI
10.1111/ijd.17554

Abstract (original English)

Background Facial aging, characterized by structural decline and loss of collagen and elastin, has led to increased demand for rejuvenation treatments. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) have emerged as a promising option, but comparative studies on their application methods are limited. Objective Our aim was to compare the efficacy of ADSC combined with microneedling or CO 2 laser for facial rejuvenation. Methods Twenty-seven participants were randomized into two groups: Microneedling (MN, n = 14) or CO 2 laser (n = 13). Each group underwent three treatment sessions at 4-week intervals. The ADSC solution was applied to one side and the placebo to the other using a split-face design. We performed objective evaluations (UV spots, brown spots, wrinkles, texture, pores, red areas, and porphyrins) and subjective assessments, including clinical photographs, patient satisfaction scales, and histological analysis of skin biopsies. Results The CO 2 laser with the ADSC group showed significantly more significant improvements in UV spots (P = 0.002) and wrinkles (P = 0.002) compared to the MN with the ADSC group. Histological analysis revealed superior elastin fibers and epidermal thickness improvements with CO 2 laser treatment. Patient satisfaction was higher in the CO 2 laser group, with 84.6% reporting complete satisfaction compared to 50% in the MN group. Conclusions The combination

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
HumansRejuvenationSkin AgingFemaleLasers, GasMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionAdultNeedlesMale

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research