Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Comparison of the neuronal differentiation abilities of bone marrow‑derived and adipose tissue‑derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Zheng Y., Huang C., Liu F., Lin H., Yang X., Zhang Z.

Animal Study, published in Mol Med Rep (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Mol Med Rep (2017)
Country
Greece
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
28731172
DOI
10.3892/mmr.2017.7069

Abstract (original English)

Bone marrow‑derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and adipose tissue‑derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) are able to differentiate into neuron‑like cells when exposed to small molecule compounds, however the specific differences in their neuronal differentiation abilities remain to be fully elucidated. The present study aimed to compare the neuronal differentiation abilities of BMSCs and ADSCs. BMSCs and ADSCs from the same Sprague Dawley rats were isolated and cultured for use. The proliferation capacity was revealed using a cell counting method. Following BMSCs and ADSCs induction by four types of small‑molecular compounds, the expression of various neuronal markers and the secretion of several neurotrophic factors were detected by immunofluorescence, western blotting, reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction and ELISA. It was demonstrated that the ADSCs exhibited an increased proliferation capacity compared with BMSCs, according to cumulative population doubling analyses. Following a 7‑day neuronal induction period, BMSCs and ADSCs exhibited a neuron‑like morphology, and were termed neuronal induced (NI)‑BMSCs and NI‑ADSCs. They expressed neuronal markers including β‑tubulin III, microtubule associated protein 2 and choline acetyltransferase. The number of NI‑BMSCs that positively expressed the neuronal markers was significantly decreased compared wit

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsBiomarkersBone Marrow CellsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCell ShapeEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGene Expression RegulationMale

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.