Comparison of nonsurgical treatment approaches for partial rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Ricker E., Stehling L., Klute L., Henßler L., Knüttel H., Zeman F.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 137 on Rotator Cuff, Shoulder Pain, published in JSES Rev Rep Tech (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Meta-analysis
- Journal
- JSES Rev Rep Tech (2026)
- Reported sample size
- 137
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 42326432
- PMCID
- PMC13279011
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.xrrt.2026.100782
Abstract (original English)
Background Rotator cuff disease constitutes the most common cause of shoulder pain, accounting for up to 70% of shoulder-related complaints, with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PT-RCTs) representing a substantial proportion. Although nonsurgical interventions are generally recommended as first-line treatment, there is currently no consensus on the optimal nonsurgical management of symptomatic PT-RCTs. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of different nonsurgical treatment modalities for PT-RCTs, specifically comparing physical therapy (PT) and injection therapies. Methods A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Eligible studies on nonsurgical interventions for PT-RCTs in adults (≥18a) were included. Clinical outcomes (Constant Score (CS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score, and visual analog scale were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis and descriptive statistics to outline study characteristics. Results From 9,894 records screened, 22 studies with 1,137 patients were included. PT was statistically superior to injection therapy in the CS ( P = .0001). Among injections, cell-based th
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Comparing Regenerative Biologics and Standard Pharmacotherapy for Chronic Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Study of PRP, Cell-Based, and Peptide Interventions
Systematic Review on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, Shoulder Pain, Chronic Inflammation, published in J Orthop Sports Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Orthop Sports Med - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Surgical vs. non-surgical therapy for partial tears of the rotator cuff: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled studies with indirect comparison
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 818 on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, Shoulder Pain, published in BMC Musculoskelet Disord (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 818
BMC Musculoskelet Disord - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
The role of injections of mesenchymal stem cells as an augmentation tool in rotator cuff repair: a systematic review.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 5 on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, published in JSES Rev Rep Tech (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 5
JSES Rev Rep Tech - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Poor consideration of tissue loading in randomised trials of MSC interventions for tendon pathology: A systematic review using the TIDieR framework.
Systematic Review on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, published in J Exp Orthop (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
J Exp Orthop - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Combined arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with mesenchymal stem cell augmentation shows similar functional outcomes but a higher structural integrity rate compared with isolated repair: a meta-analysis of comparative stu
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 415 on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, published in JSES Int (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 415
JSES Int - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Hyaluronate Acid Plus Platelet-Rich Plasma Is Superior to Steroids for Pain Relief Less Than 6 Months Using Injection Therapy of Partial Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Meta-analysis on Rotator Cuff, published in Arthroscopy (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2024
Arthroscopy6 citations