Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceMeta-analysisEurope PMCOpen access

Comparison of nonsurgical treatment approaches for partial rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ricker E., Stehling L., Klute L., Henßler L., Knüttel H., Zeman F.

Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 137 on Rotator Cuff, Shoulder Pain, published in JSES Rev Rep Tech (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level A· Stronger Clinical EvidenceEvidence level of this study

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Meta-analysis
Journal
JSES Rev Rep Tech (2026)
Reported sample size
137
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42326432
PMCID
PMC13279011
DOI
10.1016/j.xrrt.2026.100782

Abstract (original English)

Background Rotator cuff disease constitutes the most common cause of shoulder pain, accounting for up to 70% of shoulder-related complaints, with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PT-RCTs) representing a substantial proportion. Although nonsurgical interventions are generally recommended as first-line treatment, there is currently no consensus on the optimal nonsurgical management of symptomatic PT-RCTs. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of different nonsurgical treatment modalities for PT-RCTs, specifically comparing physical therapy (PT) and injection therapies. Methods A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Eligible studies on nonsurgical interventions for PT-RCTs in adults (≥18a) were included. Clinical outcomes (Constant Score (CS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score, and visual analog scale were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis and descriptive statistics to outline study characteristics. Results From 9,894 records screened, 22 studies with 1,137 patients were included. PT was statistically superior to injection therapy in the CS ( P = .0001). Among injections, cell-based th

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research