Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyEurope PMC

Comparison of results of wire subcision performed alone, with fills, and/or with adjacent surgical procedures

Sasaki GH.

Prospective Study on Scar, Skin Aging, Facial Rejuvenation, published in Aesthet Surg J (2008) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Aesthet Surg J (2008)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
19083589
DOI
10.1016/j.asj.2008.10.005
Citations
12

Abstract (original English)

Background Because of the fixed attachments (or muscle-superficial musculoaponeurotic system [SMAS] insertions) to the undersurface of wrinkles, folds, and retracted scars, the use of fills alone has resulted in unpredictable and unsatisfactory improvements. Objective To demonstrate that use of a wire dissector to completely release these attachments, accompanied by an immediate fill and/or an adjacent aesthetic surgical procedure, may optimize final results, improving deep wrinkles, folds, and scars. Methods The subcision wire was positioned under various wrinkles, folds, and scars in a triangulated outline and then zigzagged to uniformly release any subdermal attachments. Patients were divided into 4 categories based on the treatment received: group 1, wire subcision only; group 2, wire subcision plus immediate fill with a strip of autogenous filler or xenograft material; group 3, wire subcision without fill but with an adjacent aesthetic surgical procedure; and group 4, wire subcision, fill, and an adjacent surgical procedure. Results were rated with a photographic wrinkle/fold assessment scale (mean +/- standard deviation) by 2 blinded evaluators after at least 6 months. Assessment was based on a quartile grading scale that indicated improvement (0= 75% improvement). Results Eighty-five patients experienced 338 wire subcisions at 8 facial, 1 posterior neck, and 4 thigh (cel

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
FaceCicatrixHumansPostoperative ComplicationsSurgical InstrumentsSkin AgingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overMiddle Aged

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research