Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMedOpen access

Comparison of two ASC-derived therapeutics in an in vitro OA model: secretome versus extracellular vesicles.

Giannasi C., Niada S., Magagnotti C., Ragni E., Andolfo A., Brini AT.

Clinical Trial on Osteoarthritis, published in Stem Cell Res Ther (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Stem Cell Res Ther (2020)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
33272318
PMCID
PMC7711257
DOI
10.1186/s13287-020-02035-5
Citations
46

Abstract (original English)

Background In the last years, several clinical trials have proved the safety and efficacy of adipose-derived stem/stromal cells (ASC) in contrasting osteoarthritis (OA). Since ASC act mainly through paracrine mechanisms, their secretome (conditioned medium, CM) represents a promising therapeutic alternative. ASC-CM is a complex cocktail of proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids released as soluble factors and/or conveyed into extracellular vesicles (EV). Here, we investigate its therapeutic potential in an in vitro model of OA. Methods Human articular chondrocytes (CH) were induced towards an OA phenotype by 10 ng/ml TNFα in the presence of either ASC-CM or EV, both deriving from 5 × 10 5 cells, to evaluate the effect on hypertrophic, catabolic, and inflammatory markers. Results Given the same number of donor cells, our data reveal a higher therapeutic potential of ASC-CM compared to EV alone that was confirmed by its enrichment in chondroprotective factors among which TIMP-1 and -2 stand out. In details, only ASC-CM significantly decreased MMP activity (22% and 29% after 3 and 6 days) and PGE2 expression (up to 40% at day 6) boosted by the inflammatory cytokine. Conversely, both treatments down-modulated of ~ 30% the hypertrophic marker COL10A1. Conclusions These biological and molecular evidences of ASC-CM beneficial action on CH with an induced OA phenotype may lay the basis fo

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
ChondrocytesCulture Media, ConditionedExtracellular VesiclesHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteoarthritis

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research