Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Comparison of in vivo immunomodulatory effects of intravenous and intraperitoneal administration of adipose-tissue mesenchymal stem cells in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE).

Yousefi F., Ebtekar M., Soleimani M., Soudi S., Hashemi SM.

Animal Study on Neuroinflammation, Chronic Inflammation, Immune Modulation, Autoimmune Research, published in Int Immunopharmacol (2013) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Int Immunopharmacol (2013)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
23973288
DOI
10.1016/j.intimp.2013.07.016

Abstract (original English)

Due to their immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory competence, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been considered as a suitable candidate for treatment of autoimmune diseases. Earlier studies have shown that treatment with bone marrow-derived MSCs may modulate immune responses and reduce disease severity in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), an animal model of multiple sclerosis. Here we compare the immune regulatory properties of adipose tissue MSCs (AT-MSCs) in two independent routes of injection; namely intraperitoneal (i.p.) and intravenous (i.v.). We investigated the splenic CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ T cell population known as regulatory T cells, by flow cytometry and their brain cell infiltration by hematoxylin-eosin staining in both i.p. and i.v. routes of AT-MSC administration. We also evaluated the inflammatory cytokine profile including IFN-γ and IL-17 and anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4 by ELISA technique in both routes of cell administration. We show that the i.p. route has a more pronounced effect in maintaining the splenic CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ T cell population and increase of IL-4 secretion. We also showed that i.p. injection of cells resulted in lower IFN-γ secretion and reduced cell infiltration in brain more effectively as compared to the i.v. route. The effects of AT-MSCs on down-regulation of splenocyte proliferation, IL-17 secretion and alleviating

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipocytesAdipose TissueAnimalsBrainCell DifferentiationCytokinesEncephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, ExperimentalFemaleImmunomodulationInjections, Intraperitoneal

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research