Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMedOpen access

Comparison of the yields and properties of dedifferentiated fat cells and mesenchymal stem cells derived from infrapatellar fat pads.

Fujii S., Endo K., Matsuta S., Komori K., Sekiya I.

Prospective Study on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Regen Ther (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Regen Ther (2022)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
36475026
PMCID
PMC9712506
DOI
10.1016/j.reth.2022.11.006
Citations
6

Abstract (original English)

Introduction Infrapatellar fat pad (IFP)-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have high chondrogenic potential and are attractive cell sources for cartilage regeneration. During ceiling culture to acquire the characteristics of MSCs, mature adipocytes from fat tissue are known to undergo dedifferentiation, generating dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cells. The purpose of the present study was to compare the yields and biological properties of IFP-derived MSCs and IFP-derived DFAT cells. Methods IFPs were harvested from the knees of 8 osteoarthritis (OA) patients. DFAT cells were obtained using a ceiling culture of adipocytes isolated from the floating top layer of IFP digestion. MSCs were obtained by culturing precipitated stromal vascular fraction cells. We compared the P0 cell yields, surface antigen profile, colony formation ability, and multipotency of DFAT cells and MSCs. Results The P0 cell yields per flask and the estimated total cell yields from 1 g of IFP were much greater for MSCs than for DFAT cells. Both MSCs and DFAT cells were positive for MSC markers. No obvious difference was observed in colony formation ability. In differentiation assays, DFAT cells produced greater amounts of lipid droplets, calcified tissue, and glycosaminoglycan than MSCs did. Adipogenic and chondrogenic gene expressions were upregulated in DFAT cells. Conclusions IFP-derived DFAT cells showed h

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research