Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Comparisons of Neurotrophic Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Different Tissues on Chronic Spinal Cord Injury Rats.

Otsuka T., Maeda Y., Kurose T., Nakagawa K., Mitsuhara T., Kawahara Y.

Animal Study on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Stem Cells Dev (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Stem Cells Dev (2021)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
34148410
DOI
10.1089/scd.2021.0070

Abstract (original English)

Cell-based therapies with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are considered as promising strategies for spinal cord injury (SCI). MSCs have unique characteristics due to differences in the derived tissues. However, relatively few studies have focused on differences in the therapeutic effects of MSCs derived from different tissues. In this study, the therapeutic effects of adipose tissue-derived MSCs, bone marrow-derived MSCs, and cranial bone-derived MSCs (cMSCs) on chronic SCI model rats were compared. MSCs were established from the collected adipose tissue, bone marrow, and cranial bone. Neurotrophic factor expression of each MSC type was analyzed by real-time PCR. SCI rats were established using the weight-drop method and transplanted intravenously with MSCs at 4 weeks after SCI. Hindlimb motor function was evaluated from before injury to 4 weeks after transplantation. Endogenous neurotrophic factor and neural repair factor expression in spinal cord (SC) tissue were examined by real-time PCR and western blot analyses. Although there were no differences in the expression levels of cell surface markers and multipotency, expression of Bdnf , Ngf , and Sort1 ( Nt-3 ) was relatively higher in cMSCs. Transplantation of cMSCs improved motor function of chronic SCI model rats. Although there was no difference in the degree of engraftment of transplanted cells in the injured SC tissue, tr

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem CellsRatsSpinal CordSpinal Cord Injuries

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research