Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Comprehensive human cell-type methylation atlas reveals origins of circulating cell-free DNA in health and disease

Moss J., Magenheim J., Neiman D., Zemmour H., Loyfer N., Korach A.

Prospective Study, published in Nat Commun (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Nat Commun (2018)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
30498206
PMCID
PMC6265251
DOI
10.1038/s41467-018-07466-6
Citations
849

Abstract (original English)

Methylation patterns of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) contain rich information about recent cell death events in the body. Here, we present an approach for unbiased determination of the tissue origins of cfDNA, using a reference methylation atlas of 25 human tissues and cell types. The method is validated using in silico simulations as well as in vitro mixes of DNA from different tissue sources at known proportions. We show that plasma cfDNA of healthy donors originates from white blood cells (55%), erythrocyte progenitors (30%), vascular endothelial cells (10%) and hepatocytes (1%). Deconvolution of cfDNA from patients reveals tissue contributions that agree with clinical findings in sepsis, islet transplantation, cancer of the colon, lung, breast and prostate, and cancer of unknown primary. We propose a procedure which can be easily adapted to study the cellular contributors to cfDNA in many settings, opening a broad window into healthy and pathologic human tissue dynamics.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
ErythrocytesLeukocytesCells, CulturedEndothelial CellsHepatocytesHumansSepsisBreast NeoplasmsColonic NeoplasmsLung Neoplasms

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.