Concise review: human adipose-derived stem cells: separating promise from clinical need.
Locke M., Feisst V., Dunbar PR.
Clinical Trial, published in Stem Cells (2011) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Clinical Trial
- Journal
- Stem Cells (2011)
- Country
- England
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 21425404
- DOI
- 10.1002/stem.593
- Citations
- 112
Abstract (original English)
Human adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) have become an increasing interest to both stem cell biologists and clinicians because of their potential to differentiate into adipogenic, osteogenic, chondrogenic, and other mesenchymal lineages, as well as other clinically useful properties attributed to them, such as stimulation of angiogenesis and suppression of inflammation. ASCs have already been used in a number of clinical trials, and some successful outcomes have been reported, especially in tissue reconstruction. However, a critical review of the literature reveals considerable uncertainty about the true clinical potential of human ASC. First, the surgical needs that ASC might answer remain relatively few, given the current difficulties in scaling up ASC-based tissue engineering to a clinically useful volume. Second, the differentiation of ASC into cell lineages apart from adipocytes has not been conclusively demonstrated in many studies due to the use of rather simplistic approaches to the confirmation of differentiation, such as the use of nonspecific histological dyes, or a small number of molecular markers of uncertain significance. Third, the ASC prepared from human lipoaspirate for different studies differ in purity and molecular phenotype, with many studies using cell preparations that are likely to contain heterogeneous populations of cells, making it uncertain whether
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.