Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Concise Review: Stem Cell Fate Guided By Bioactive Molecules for Tendon Regeneration

Zhang YJ., Chen X., Li G., Chan KM., Heng BC., Yin Z.

Narrative Review on Tendon Injury, published in Stem Cells Transl Med (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Stem Cells Transl Med (2018)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
29573225
PMCID
PMC5905226
DOI
10.1002/sctm.17-0206
Citations
40

Abstract (original English)

Tendon disorders, which are commonly presented in the clinical setting, disrupt the patients' normal work and life routines, and they damage the careers of athletes. However, there is still no effective treatment for tendon disorders. In the field of tissue engineering, the potential of the therapeutic application of exogenous stem cells to treat tendon pathology has been demonstrated to be promising. With the development of stem cell biology and chemical biology, strategies that use inductive tenogenic factors to program stem cell fate in situ are the most easily and readily translatable to clinical applications. In this review, we focus on bioactive molecules that can potentially induce tenogenesis in adult stem cells, and we summarize the various differentiation factors found in comparative studies. Moreover, we discuss the molecular regulatory mechanisms of tenogenesis, and we examine the various challenges in developing standardized protocols for achieving efficient and reproducible tenogenesis. Finally, we discuss and predict future directions for tendon regeneration. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2018;7:404-414.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
TendonsStem CellsAnimalsHumansTissue EngineeringRegenerationCell DifferentiationTissue Scaffolds

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research