Considerations for high-yield, high-throughput cell enrichment: fluorescence versus magnetic sorting
Sutermaster BA., Darling EM.
Laboratory Study on Systemic / IV, published in Sci Rep (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Sci Rep (2019)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 30659223
- PMCID
- PMC6338736
- DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-018-36698-1
- Citations
- 137
Abstract (original English)
Efficient sorting methods are required for the isolation of cellular subpopulations in basic science and translational applications. Despite this, throughputs, yields, viabilities, and processing times of common sorting methods like fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) are underreported. In the current study, we set out to quantify the ability of these sorting methods to separate defined mixtures of alkaline phosphatase liver/bone/kidney (ALPL)-expressing and non-expressing cell types. Results showed that initial MACS runs performed using manufacturer's recommended antibody and microbead concentrations produced inaccurate ALPL+ vs. ALPL- cell splits compared to FACS when ALPL+ cells were present in larger proportions (>~25%). Accuracy at all proportions could be achieved by using substantially higher concentrations of labeling reagents. Importantly, MACS sorts resulted in only 7-9% cell loss compared to ~70% cell loss for FACS. Additionally, MACS processing was 4-6 times faster than FACS for single, low proportion samples but took similar time for single, high-proportion samples. When processing multiple samples, MACS was always faster overall due to its ability to run samples in parallel. Average cell viability for all groups remained high (>83%), regardless of sorting method. Despite requiring substantial optimization, the abil
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
The suitability of mesenchymal stem cells for treating immune-mediated inflammatory skin diseases: a systematic review
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 609 on Hair Loss, Immune Modulation, Autoimmune Research, published in Dermatol Reports (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 609
Dermatol Reports - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
The Influence of GLP-1 Agonists on Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Systematic Review
Systematic Review on Type 2 Diabetes, published in Stem Cell Rev Rep (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Stem Cell Rev Rep2 citations - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Single cell transcriptomics of human weight loss links adipocyte NPY1R to control of lipolysis
Meta-analysis on Systemic / IV, published in Mol Metab (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Mol Metab - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Clinical Applications of Autologous Fat Grafting in Pathological Hand Conditions.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 7 on Osteoarthritis, Scar, published in J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 7
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Studies.
Systematic Review on Neuroinflammation, published in Tissue Eng Regen Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Tissue Eng Regen Med - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Applications of Exosomes in Female Medicine: A Systematic Review of Molecular Biology, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Perspectives
Systematic Review on Face & Skin, Systemic / IV, published in Int J Mol Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Int J Mol Sci2 citations