Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMedOpen access

Contouring and augmentation of the temple using stromal vascular fraction gel grafting.

Zhang Y., Zou J., Yuan Y., Gao J., Chen X.

Prospective Study with a reported sample of 34, published in Front Surg (2022) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Front Surg (2022)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
34
Source database
PubMed
PMID
36061057
PMCID
PMC9428844
DOI
10.3389/fsurg.2022.893219
Citations
6

Abstract (original English)

Hollowing temples are common in aging Asians. Stromal vascular fraction (SVF) gel is a novel, mechanically processed adipose-derived product containing condensed adipose-derived stem cells and native extracellular matrix, allowing improved fat grafting. The present study evaluated the effectiveness of SVF-gel treatment on temple hollowing. This prospective, single-center study included an SVF-gel grafting group ( n = 34) and a Coleman's fat grafting group ( n = 29). Temple contour was assessed using preoperative and postoperative photographs. Temple augmentation was quantified using three-dimensional (3D) technology and an MVS-600 3D scanner system. Patient satisfaction was assessed postoperatively. At 12 months follow-up, the minimal forehead width/forehead width ratio and the width of the temporal peak were increased in both groups ( p < 0.05).; and the retention rate (41.2% ± 8.4%) of the SVF-gel group was significantly higher than that of Coleman's fat group (32.6% ± 8.8%; p < 0.05). Moreover, patients in the SVF-gel group reported higher satisfaction scores than those in Coleman's fat group. SVF-gel is effective for temple contouring and augmentation., with increased efficacy compared with Coleman's fat.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.