Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Conventional vs. micro-fat harvesting: how fat harvesting technique affects tissue-engineering approaches using adipose tissue-derived stem/stromal cells.

Alharbi Z., Opländer C., Almakadi S., Fritz A., Vogt M., Pallua N.

Prospective Study with a reported sample of 10 on Face & Skin, published in J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg (2013) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg (2013)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
10
Source database
PubMed
PMID
23732072
DOI
10.1016/j.bjps.2013.04.015
Citations
55

Abstract (original English)

Background Biocompatible scaffolds as dermal substitutes are used commonly in soft tissue reconstruction and tissue-engineering approaches. The combination of these scaffolds with mesenchymal stem and stromal cells would have additional benefits in multilayer soft tissue reconstruction. In addition, the use of lipoaspirate may be beneficial for this purpose containing high levels of regenerative cells and relevant growth factors. However there are many factors, which may impact the lipoaspirate content of isolated cells, cell behaviour and growth factors. There is a lack of data as to whether fat-harvesting procedures using different cannulas of small diameter will impact these parameters, which are relevant not only for tissue engineering but also for clinical outcome. Methods Abdominal liposuctions were performed on 10 patients using the conventional fat harvesting by the Coleman cannula (3 mm, one-hole blunt tip) and the micro-fat-harvesting technique by the st'RIM cannula (2 mm, multi-perforated hole blunt tip) on contralateral area. Lipoaspirate contents of insulin-like growth factor (IGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The in vitro viability of lipoaspirates was tested by the alamarBlue™ assay. Adipose-derived stem/stroma

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
AdipocytesAdipose TissueAdultFemaleHumansLipectomyMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSampling Studies

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research