Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Correction of breast deformities after breast-conserving surgery in Chinese women with breast cancer: a narrative review

Wu Z., Zhong L., Gu J., Xie H., Guo F.

Narrative Review, published in Front Oncol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Front Oncol (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41049853
PMCID
PMC12488419
DOI
10.3389/fonc.2025.1648679

Abstract (original English)

Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is a key treatment option for early-stage breast cancer, balancing oncologic control with cosmetic outcomes. However, postoperative breast deformities occur in approximately 25% to 30% of cases, significantly impacting patients' body image and psychological well-being. Although advances in oncoplastic surgery have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of corrective procedures-effectively improving breast appearance, alleviating anxiety, and enhancing quality of life-the acceptance rate of such surgeries remains relatively low in China. This reluctance is influenced by multiple factors, including personal characteristics, social support, disease-related features, and treatment experiences. This article reviews the necessity and safety of deformity correction after BCT, as well as the factors affecting patients' willingness to undergo such procedures. The aim is to help clinicians identify suitable candidates for corrective surgery, promote multidisciplinary interventions and decision-making support, and ultimately improve the correction rate and overall quality of life for breast cancer patients.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.