Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Craniomaxillofacial-Derived MSCs in Congenital Defect Reconstruction

Song X., Peng L., Bian Z., Yin W.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in Biomolecules (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Biomolecules (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40723825
PMCID
PMC12292143
DOI
10.3390/biom15070953

Abstract (original English)

Tissue defects resulting from craniomaxillofacial congenital developmental anomalies significantly compromise both the physical and psychological health of patients. Due to the constraints of autologous and allogeneic transplantation, stem cell-based regenerative therapies present a promising alternative. As a crucial source of cell therapy, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are widely employed for tissue regeneration on account of their exceptional proliferative capacity and multidirectional differentiation potential. Nevertheless, several challenges remain in clinical application, such as the immunogenicity, long-term safety, and therapeutic efficacy. This review centers on the application of craniomaxillofacial MSCs in the treatment of craniomaxillofacial congenital defects and the challenges confronted in regenerative therapy, aiming to provide new perspectives for the clinical management of these conditions.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Mesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsHumansCraniofacial AbnormalitiesMaxillofacial AbnormalitiesMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationCell DifferentiationPlastic Surgery Procedures

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research