Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Crosstalk between adipose-derived stem/stromal cells and vocal fold fibroblasts in vitro.

Kumai Y., Kobler JB., Park H., Lopez-Guerra G., Karajanagi S., Herrera VL.

Animal Study on Scar, published in Laryngoscope (2009) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Laryngoscope (2009)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
19263411
DOI
10.1002/lary.20149

Abstract (original English)

To explore adipose-derived stem cell/fibroblast interactions as a potential remodeling pathway for vocal fold scar. Fibroblasts and adipose-derived stem/stromal cells (ASCs) were cultured alone and in combination in a cell-contact-independent paracrine system. Analyses of cell proliferation, and the production of hyaluronic acid (HA) and collagen were performed on samples collected on days 1, 3, and 7. Normal fibroblasts (NFs) were isolated bilaterally from the subepithelial lamina propria of two normal ferret vocal folds. Scar fibroblasts (SFs) were isolated from vocal folds that were electrocauterized 2 weeks before harvest. ASCs were isolated from lipoaspirated subcutaneous abdominal fat of two ferrets. A transwell cell-contact-independent cell communication culturing system was used for coculture experiments. Cells were seeded at 50,000/well in both monoculture and coculture experiments. In monoculture, SFs proliferated faster and produced less HA and more collagen than NFs at day 7 (P < .05). In SF/ASC coculture, SF proliferation was diminished and collagen production at day 7 decreased (P < .05). HA production did not differ between monoculture and coculture conditions. Normal and scar-tissue-derived vocal fold fibroblasts maintain phenotypic differences in culture, thus validating this in vitro scar model. In co-culture, contact-independent crosstalk occurs between SFs a

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsCell CountCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCicatrixCoculture TechniquesCollagenDisease Models, AnimalElectrochemical Techniques

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research