Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsRetrospective StudyPubMed

CT-defined body composition as a prognostic factor in multiple myeloma.

Surov A., Benkert F., Pönisch W., Meyer HJ.

Retrospective Study with a reported sample of 22, published in Hematology (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Retrospective Study
Journal
Hematology (2023)
Country
England
Reported sample size
22
Source database
PubMed
PMID
36946869
DOI
10.1080/16078454.2023.2191075

Abstract (original English)

Body composition assessment is comprised by skeletal muscle mass (SMM) and subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue (SAT and VAT) and can be quantified by imaging. It can be predictive of several clinically outcomes in patients with hematological diseases. Our aim was to establish the effect of body composition parameters on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). All patients with MM were retrospectively analyzed between 2009 and 2019. One hundred twenty-three patients were included into the analysis. Whole-body computed tomography (CT) was used to calculate SMM, VAT, and SAT. Overall, 22 patients (17.9%) of the patient sample died. Forty patients were sarcopenic (32.5%), 79 patients were visceral obese (64.2%), and 18 patients (14.6%) were sarcopenic obese. Parameter of body composition did not influence OS: sarcopenia, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.3 (95% CI 0.50-3.34), p = .59; visceral obesity, HR = 1.6 (95% CI 0.70-3.76), p = .26; sarcopenic obesity, HR = 2.3 (95% CI 0.90-5.63), p = 0.08. Patients with infectious complications showed higher VAT values. CT-defined body composition parameters have no influence on survival in patients with MM undergoing autologous stem-cell therapy. These results corroborate previous smaller studies that body composition might have a limited role in this tumor entity. VAT may predict the occu

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
HumansSarcopeniaPrognosisMultiple MyelomaRetrospective StudiesBody CompositionTomography, X-Ray ComputedObesity

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.