Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Culturing 3D chitosan/gelatin/nano-hydroxyapatite and bone-derived scaffolds in a dynamic environment enhances osteochondral reconstruction.

Hu X., Su Y., Ma H., Zhu J., Cheng YY., Li W.

Animal Study on Cartilage Damage, published in Int J Biol Macromol (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Int J Biol Macromol (2024)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39581399
DOI
10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.137892

Abstract (original English)

Bioreactor can provide a dynamic culture environment for the in vitro construction of osteochondral tissue engineering. They facilitate more efficient exchange of nutrients and provide mechanical and other beneficial stimulation. Previous findings demonstrated that rotary flask (RF) bioreactor, rotary cell culture system (RCCS), or electromagnetic field (EMF) mediated scaffold culture could create a favorable dynamic environment for osteochondral tissue engineering. However, it is still unclear whether there is an optimal bioreactor or if bioreactors under multi-parameter coupling conditions are conducive to osteochondral tissue engineering. Based on this, the application of static T-flask (TF), RF, RCCS, and coupling environment of RCCS and EMF for osteochondral tissue engineering were systematically compared. The results showed that the RCCS/EMF culture system achieved the highest level of cellular proliferation and directed differentiation. Compared with the static culture group, the expression levels of chondrogenic factors of Sox9, Col II, and ACAN and osteogenic factors of Runx2, OCN, and Col I in RCCS/EMF culture system were 2.90 ± 0.10, 3.53 ± 0.05, 3.15 ± 0.08, 7.16 ± 0.15, 5.01 ± 0.21 and 3.99 ± 0.17 folds, respectively. The 'Active osteochondral' constructs (The construct is composed of chitosan/gelatin/nano-hydroxyapatite and bone-derived scaffolds) were prepared un

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Tissue ScaffoldsChitosanGelatinAnimalsTissue EngineeringDurapatiteRabbitsOsteogenesisCell DifferentiationChondrogenesis

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research