Current art of combination therapy with autologous platelet-rich plasma for stable vitiligo: A meta-analysis
Chen J., Wan Y., Lin Y., Jiang H.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 670, published in Int Wound J (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Meta-analysis
- Journal
- Int Wound J (2021)
- Reported sample size
- 670
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 33245822
- PMCID
- PMC8243985
- DOI
- 10.1111/iwj.13524
- Citations
- 15
Abstract (original English)
Presently, there is an explosion in various uses of platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Several trials comparing combination therapy with PRP vs monotherapy for vitiligo have been published. However, evidence-based information is not enough for making well-informed decisions. This study aimed to evaluate several combination therapy strategies for vitiligo. EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases were searched to identify randomised controlled trials comparing combination therapy with PRP vs monotherapy for vitiligo. Eleven studies with 670 cases were included. Compared with monotherapy, clinical improvement of repigmentation was significantly higher in 308-nm excimer laser combined with PRP (odds rate for response rate of 50%-100% repigmentation, 4.47; 95% CI, 2.47-8.10; P < .00001) and in fractional carbon dioxide laser combined with PRP (mean difference for mean improvement grades of repigmentation, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.24-2.99; P = .02), respectively. Compared to monotherapy, there is no higher clinical improvement in strategies of PRP combined with narrowband-ultraviolet B or non-cultured epidermal cell suspension. Trivial adverse events were reported. This meta-analysis summarises current evidence that PRP combined with 308-nm excimer laser or fractional carbon dioxide laser is effective and safe for vitiligo. This systematic review and meta-analys
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Relatively higher-quality human studies compared with other topics in this database, e.g. multiple RCTs or systematic reviews. This does not mean it is standard or approved care.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.