Current Fat Grafting Practices and Preferences: A Survey from Members of ISPRES.
Vizcay M., Saha S., Mohammad A., Pu LLQ., Yoshimura K., Magalon G.
Laboratory Study, published in Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2023)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 37006989
- PMCID
- PMC10060090
- DOI
- 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004849
- Citations
- 7
Abstract (original English)
Fat grafting has established its niche in a wide spectrum of aesthetic and reconstructive procedures. A consensus-based method of harvest, processing, enrichment, injection, and assessment is lacking, despite the rising trends in its application. We conducted a survey among plastic surgeons to evaluate and identify trends of fat grafting practices. Methods We conducted an electronic survey with a 30-item questionnaire of 62 members of the International Society of Plastic Regenerative Surgeons. We collected demographic information, techniques, and experiences related to large volume (100-200 ml) and small-volume ( Results The majority of the respondents worked predominantly as aesthetic surgeons. The donor area selection was based on the patient's fat availability (59.7%). For fat enrichment, platelet-rich-plasma and adipose stem cells were routinely used by 12.9% and 9.7% of respondents, respectively. A 3- to 4-mm cannula with three holes was the most preferred instrument for large-volume fat harvesting (69.5%). For small-volume fat grafting, 2-mm cannulas (75.8%) with Mercedes tip (27.3%) were used most commonly. For processing, decantation of fat was performed by 56.5% of respondents (without exclusivity). For handheld injections (without exclusivity), respondents preferred a 1- to 2-mm cannula with a 1 cm 3 syringe. The most popular method of outcome assessment was photograp
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.