Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Current practice in autologous fat transplantation: suggested clinical guidelines based on a review of recent literature

Locke MB., de Chalain TM.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in Ann Plast Surg (2008) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Ann Plast Surg (2008)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
18281805
DOI
10.1097/sap.0b013e318038f74c
Citations
64

Abstract (original English)

After more than a century of use, fat grafting is firmly entrenched in the skill set of plastic surgeons. While macrofat grafting is relatively predictable and reliable, microfat grafting by injection is still in the stages of technical evolution. Review of the current literature suggests that revascularization may take up to 21 days to reach the center of a microfat graft. We recommend harvesting by excision (or gentle aspiration), processing by short and gentle centrifuge to separate the layers, and reinjection of the lower layer via a fine cannula (for example, 17 gauge for the face) and a 1-mL syringe with multiple passes, injecting only a tiny amount with each pass as the needle is withdrawn, to obtain the most reliable clinical outcome.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsHumansTissue and Organ HarvestingTransplantation, AutologousCentrifugationInjectionsGraft Survival

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research