Current status of bone regeneration using adipose-derived stem cells.
Tajima S., Tobita M., Mizuno H.
Narrative Review, published in Histol Histopathol (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Histol Histopathol (2017)
- Country
- Spain
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 29094748
- DOI
- 10.14670/HH-11-942
- Citations
- 16
Abstract (original English)
Many bone regeneration therapies have been developed for clinical use and have variable outcomes and serious limitations. The goal of bone regeneration is to repair a bone defect in a stable and durable manner. Cellular strategies play an important role in bone tissue engineering. Clinical factors important for successful bone regeneration are the recruitment of cells to the defect site and the production of a suitable extracellular matrix consistent with bone tissues. Adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) can be obtained in large quantities with little donor site morbidity or patient discomfort. They are multipotent somatic stem cells and have a strong potential to differentiate and secrete growth factors. In this review, we discuss the osteogenic potential of ASCs with/without several types of scaffolds in vivo and their clinical application for bone regeneration.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.