Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Current status and challenges in uterine myometrial tissue engineering

Hanuman S., Pande G., Nune M.

Narrative Review on Scar, published in Bioengineered (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Bioengineered (2023)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
37665570
PMCID
PMC10478746
DOI
10.1080/21655979.2023.2251847
Citations
15

Abstract (original English)

The uterus undergoes significant modifications throughout pregnancy to support embryo development and fetal growth. However, conditions like fibroids, adenomyosis, cysts, and C-section scarring can cause myometrial damage. The importance of the uterus and the challenges associated with myometrial damage, and the need for alternative approaches are discussed in this review. The review also explores the recent studies in tissue engineering, which involve principles of combining cells, scaffolds, and signaling molecules to create functional uterine tissues. It focuses on two key approaches in uterine tissue engineering: scaffold technique using decellularized, natural, and synthetic polymer and 3D bioprinting. These techniques create supportive structures for cell growth and tissue formation. Current treatment options for myometrial damage have limitations, leading to the exploration of regenerative medicine and integrative therapies. The review emphasizes the potential benefits of tissue engineering, including more effective and less invasive treatment options for myometrial damage. The challenges of developing biocompatible materials and optimizing cell growth and differentiation are discussed. In conclusion, uterine tissue engineering holds promise for myometrial regeneration and the treatment of related conditions. This review highlights the scientific advancements in the fiel

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
UterusHumansBiocompatible MaterialsTissue EngineeringCell CycleCell DifferentiationPregnancyFemale

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research