Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Current status of platelet-rich plasma therapy under the act on the safety of regenerative medicine in Japan

Arita A., Tobita M.

Narrative Review on Osteoarthritis, published in Regen Ther (2023) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Regen Ther (2023)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
37063096
PMCID
PMC10090952
DOI
10.1016/j.reth.2023.03.001
Citations
9

Abstract (original English)

In Japan, a legal framework has been established for the safe and effective application of regenerative medicine. After eight years of the Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine (RM Act), discussions have been underway in the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan to revise the law owing to numerous novel technologies and inappropriate case reports not anticipated when the law was enacted. Therefore, in this review article, we have reviewed the regenerative medicine provision plans and the contribution of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy, a regenerative medicine technique widely used in Japan post RM Act implementation, to these plans. As of January 2022, 97.2% of the regenerative medicine provided under the RM Act had been for private practice, and most of them were Class Ⅲ regenerative medicine. Notably, PRP was the most used processed cell under the RM Act. PRP therapy accounted for approximately 66% of the regenerative medicine provision plans in clinical research or private practice and was the most provided regenerative medicine technology in Japan. PRP therapy was primarily used in dentistry to regenerate periodontal tissue (approximately 50%), followed by orthopedics, where it is used to treat osteoarthritis. We suggest that further discussion is essential to determine the factors that should be addressed by the RM act to evaluate the efficacy and safety o

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research