Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMC

Current Status of Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds for Rotator Cuff Repair

Chainani A., Little D.

Laboratory Study on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, published in Tech Orthop (2016) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Tech Orthop (2016)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
27346922
PMCID
PMC4918813
DOI
10.1097/bto.0000000000000168
Citations
27

Abstract (original English)

Rotator cuff tears continue to be at significant risk for re-tear or for failure to heal after surgical repair despite the use of a variety of surgical techniques and augmentation devices. Therefore, there is a need for functionalized scaffold strategies to provide sustained mechanical augmentation during the critical first 12-weeks following repair, and to enhance the healing potential of the repaired tendon and tendon-bone interface. Tissue engineered approaches that combine the use of scaffolds, cells, and bioactive molecules towards promising new solutions for rotator cuff repair are reviewed. The ideal scaffold should have adequate initial mechanical properties, be slowly degrading or non-degradable, have non-toxic degradation products, enhance cell growth, infiltration and differentiation, promote regeneration of the tendon-bone interface, be biocompatible and have excellent suture retention and handling properties. Scaffolds that closely match the inhomogeneity and non-linearity of the native rotator cuff may significantly advance the field. While substantial pre-clinical work remains to be done, continued progress in overcoming current tissue engineering challenges should allow for successful clinical translation.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research