Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialEurope PMCOpen access

Dawn of a new era in olfactory regeneration: Pediatric stem cell therapy enters the era of long-term validation

Chen GY., Kang JB., Wang YK., Liu M.

Clinical Trial, published in World J Stem Cells (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
World J Stem Cells (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41608654
PMCID
PMC12836205
DOI
10.4252/wjsc.v18.i1.114751

Abstract (original English)

A recently published prospective study marks a breakthrough for congenital olfactory disorders in children. The study provides the first long-term, three-year follow-up data, robustly demonstrating the durable efficacy and safety of autologous nasal epithelial stem cell transplantation. This work reveals immense therapeutic potential for a condition traditionally considered untreatable. However, this milestone achievement also presents new challenges. To translate this pioneering therapy from a single-center success to a global standard, multicenter, controlled clinical trials must be initiated immediately. Only through rigorous validation can we ensure its widespread adoption and ultimately bring hope to millions of children worldwide.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.