Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Deep Plane Face Lift in Asian Patients

Wong CH., Hsieh MKH., Mendelson B.

Prospective Study on Scar, Skin Aging, published in Plast Reconstr Surg (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Plast Reconstr Surg (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40183553
PMCID
PMC12456200
DOI
10.1097/prs.0000000000012102
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Background The deep plane face lift has the technical advantages of being more effective in mobilization of soft tissues of the anterior face and allowing for more direct fixation of these tissues. These attributes of the deep plane face lift make it advantageous for Asian faces. Methods Between January of 2021 and August of 2023, 61 Asian patients with a mean age of 52 years (range, 38 to 75 years) underwent the deep plane face lift. The authors' surgical technique and refinements in performing this procedure were demonstrated in detail. These included specific mobilization endpoints; a systemic approach to suture fixation, with each fixation suture targeting specific landmarks in the anterior face for tightening; and a systematic system of skin flap inset to ensure precise and tension-free closure. The mean follow-up was 19 months. Patient satisfaction was assessed with a targeted survey covering their appearance and quality of life. Results Long-term results were good. Patient satisfaction was high, with 98% reporting that they were satisfied or highly satisfied with their results. Patients reported improvement of both their appearance and quality of life after surgery. Complication rates were low and included superficial epidermolysis behind the ears ( n = 2 [3%]), hypertrophic scarring ( n = 1 [1.6%]), and facial nerve neurapraxia ( n = 1 [1.6%]). There was no hematoma. Co

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
FaceSurgical FlapsHumansPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeRhytidoplastySuture TechniquesFollow-Up StudiesQuality of LifeAdult

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research