Development of artificial transcription factors and their applications in cell reprograming, genetic screen, and disease treatment
Sang Y., Xu L., Bao Z.
Narrative Review, published in Mol Ther (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Mol Ther (2024)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39473180
- PMCID
- PMC11638881
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ymthe.2024.10.029
- Citations
- 4
Abstract (original English)
Gene dysregulations are associated with many human diseases, such as cancers and hereditary diseases. Artificial transcription factors (ATFs) are synthetic molecular tools to regulate the expression of disease-associated genes, which is of great significance in basic biological research and biomedical applications. Recent advances in the engineering of ATFs for regulating endogenous gene expression provide an expanded set of tools for understanding and treating diseases. However, the potential immunogenicity, large size, inefficient delivery, and off-target effects persist as obstacles for ATFs to be developed into therapeutics. Moreover, the activation of an endogenous gene following ATF activity lacks durability. In this review, we first describe the functional components of ATFs, including DNA-binding domains, transcriptional effector domains, and control switches. We then highlight examples of applications of ATFs, including cell reprogramming and differentiation, pathogenic gene screening, and disease treatment. Finally, we analyze and summarize major challenges for the clinical translation of ATFs and propose potential strategies to improve these useful molecular tools.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.