Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

A Developmental Roadmap Toward Abdominal Adhesions Prevention Technologies

Christensen RR., Wright KE., Ives JK., Minnick CE., Chen Q., Girgis MD.

Narrative Review, published in Ann Surg Open (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Ann Surg Open (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41451177
PMCID
PMC12727408
DOI
10.1097/as9.0000000000000637

Abstract (original English)

Abdominal adhesions are a globally disruptive problem to patients and healthcare systems, with limited preventative strategies. Multiple discovery prophylactics have been evaluated previously for adhesions prevention with inadequate transfer to patient care. Clinical translation is fundamentally restricted by the ability of a discovery prophylactic to simultaneously navigate 3 key components of adhesions formation throughout the entire abdomen: the innate immune system, the coagulation system, and the local peritoneal cell populations. Furthermore, challenging handling characteristics and product restrictions have decreased the utilization of clinically available prophylactics by surgeons. The success of future adhesions prevention strategies must also be anchored in clinically valid animal modeling with attention towards future regulatory approval. The purpose of the present roadmap article is to provide a state-of-the-art review of adhesions pathophysiology, hydrogel development, animal modeling, and regulatory science, from which a framework for future developmental strategies may be outlined.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.