Diagnosis and Management of Neuropathic Breast Pain
Bejar-Chapa M., Caragher SP., Gfrerer L., Valerio IL., Colwell AS., Winograd JM.
Prospective Study, published in Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Prospective Study
- Journal
- Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open (2024)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39717719
- PMCID
- PMC11666212
- DOI
- 10.1097/gox.0000000000006266
Abstract (original English)
Chronic postoperative pain after breast surgery is a significant concern, with studies indicating varying rates depending on the type of surgical procedure. The risk of developing neuropathic pain is notably increased with axillary lymph node dissection due to potential nerve injuries. Additionally, the method of breast reconstruction may influence postsurgical pain rates, with conflicting findings on the impact of reconstruction type. Recent advancements in techniques such as targeted muscle reinnervation, among others, show promise in addressing postoperative pain in these patients. As the prevalence of these procedures rises, future research is likely to focus on assessing and managing pain in this patient population. The development of patient-reported outcome measures specific to breast surgery pain can aid in clinical assessment and treatment planning. This review emphasizes the importance of gaining a deeper understanding of risk factors, nerve anatomy, and treatment options to enhance outcomes and quality of life for individuals undergoing breast surgery.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.