Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

Different osteogenic differentiation potential of mesenchymal stem cells on three different polymeric substrates.

Abazari MF., Hosseini Z., Zare Karizi S., Norouzi S., Amini Faskhoudi M., Saburi E.

Laboratory Study, published in Gene (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Gene (2020)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
32145328
DOI
10.1016/j.gene.2020.144534
Citations
20

Abstract (original English)

The function of tissue cells is strongly depends on the extracellular matrix (ECM) that can guide and support cell structure. This support plays a crucial role in the process of cell proliferation and differentiation. Herein, three different nanofibrous scaffolds that are highly attractive for tissue engineering were selected and then osteogenic related genes and protein expression patterns of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AT-MSCs) were investigated when grown on substrates. Polycaprolactone, Poly (L-lactic acid) and Polyvinylidene-fluoride nanofibrous scaffolds were fabricated using Electrospinning method and then AT-MSCs viability and osteogenic differentiation were evaluated while cultured on them. The highest AT-MSCs survival rate when grown on the scaffolds was detected when grown on Polyvinylidene-fluoride. In addition, the highest ALP activity and mineralization were also observed in differentiated AT-MSCs has grown on Polyvinylidene-fluoride. The expression levels of Runx2, osteonectin and osteocalcin genes and osteocalcin protein in the AT-MSCs has grown on the Polyvinylidene-fluoride were also significantly higher than the rest of the scaffolds. Based on the results, it seems that since the studied substrate have a similar structural characteristics, their nature may have an important role in the stem cell's osteogenesis process, where the Polyvinylide

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Core Binding Factor Alpha 1 SubunitHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsNanofibersOsteocalcinOsteogenesisOsteonectinPolyestersPolyvinylsTissue Engineering

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.