Differentiation of human adipose-derived adult stem cells into neuronal tissue: does it work?
Franco Lambert AP., Fraga Zandonai A., Bonatto D., Cantarelli Machado D., Pêgas Henriques JA.
Narrative Review, published in Differentiation (2009) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Differentiation (2009)
- Country
- England
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 19272520
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.diff.2008.10.016
Abstract (original English)
Adipose tissue contains many cells and proteins that are of value not only for their potential therapeutic applications, but also for the low cost of their harvest and delivery. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) were originally isolated from the bone marrow, although similar populations have been isolated from adipose and other tissues. At one time, neural tissues were not regarded as regenerative populations of cells. Therefore, the identification of cell populations capable of neuronal differentiation has generated immense interest. Adipose tissue may represent an alternative source of cells that are capable of neuronal differentiation, potentially enhancing its use in the treatment of neurological disease. The aim of this review is to cover the current state of knowledge of the differentiation potential of human adipose-derived stem (ADAS) cells, specifically their ability to give rise to neuronal cells in vitro. This review presents and discusses different protocols used for inducing human ADAS cells to differentiate in vitro, and the neuronal markers utilized in each system.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.