Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Do progenitor cells from different tissue have the same phenotype?

Godoy RF., Alves AL., Gibson AJ., Lima EM., Goodship AE.

Animal Study on Face & Skin, published in Res Vet Sci (2014) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Res Vet Sci (2014)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
24636541
DOI
10.1016/j.rvsc.2014.02.013

Abstract (original English)

The purpose of this work was to validate isolation methods for sheep mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) from different sources and to explore the hypothesis that MSC exhibit markers of the same phenotype independent from tissue source. Cells derived from ovine bone marrow, synovial membrane and adipose tissue were characterized using the following markers: CD44, CD45, CD11b and MHC-I. The isolated MSC were cultivated, went through osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic differentiation, and were characterized by flow cytometry using mouse anti-ovine CD44, CD45 and MHC-I monoclonal antibody (mAb), and mouse anti-bovine CD11b mAb. Ovine MSC from all three sources differentiated under chondorgenic, osteogenic and adipogenic conditions. Also, MSC from the three tissues were found to express CD44 and MHC-I but lack of CD11b and CD45. The results obtained revealed that our isolation methods for the different tissues tested are valid and that MSC from the three sources studied have same immunophenotic characteristics.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipogenesisAdipose TissueAnimalsBone Marrow CellsCD11b AntigenChondrogenesisFemaleFlow CytometryHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHyaluronan Receptors

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research