Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Does extracellular vesicle specificity truly exist?

Muhandiram S., Fazeli A.

Narrative Review, published in Cell Commun Signal (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Cell Commun Signal (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41593667
PMCID
PMC12918545
DOI
10.1186/s12964-026-02654-0
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nano-sized membranous particles secreted by nearly all cell types that facilitate intercellular communication through the transfer of bioactive cargo. Growing evidence suggests that EVs may exhibit targeting specificity toward particular cells, yet the mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this review, we critically examine the concept of EV target specificity by outlining three potential stages where it may arise: (1) EV binding to the recipient cell membrane, (2) internalization and cargo release and (3) the induction of functional responses within recipient cells. We further explore how EV-intrinsic properties, recipient cell characteristics, and the surrounding microenvironment collectively shape these interactions. A key challenge in the field is the frequent assumption that EV uptake equates to functional relevance. In reality, many internalized EVs are recycled or degraded in lysosomes without eliciting any measurable effect. We therefore propose a refined definition of EV specificity, emphasizing that functional outcomes should serve as the central criterion for establishing meaningful EV specificity. Rather than offering definitive answers, this review highlights unresolved questions and calls for deeper investigation into how EVs select their target cells. Understanding these fundamental principles of EV function is critical for adva

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Cell MembraneAnimalsHumansCell CommunicationExtracellular Vesicles

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.