Droplet-based bioprinting
Gupta D., Derman ID., Xu C., Huang Y., Ozbolat IT.
Laboratory Study, published in Nat Rev Methods Primers (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- Nat Rev Methods Primers (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41878399
- PMCID
- PMC13007925
- DOI
- 10.1038/s43586-025-00394-y
- Citations
- 10
Abstract (original English)
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting facilitates the automated patterning of biological entities (such as cells and tissue building blocks) with or without scaffolding biomaterials. The technique enables fabrication of highly organized structures that recapitulate the physiological and biological functions of native tissues. Droplet-based bioprinting (DBB) is unique among the existing bioprinting modalities in its ability to handle and manipulate bioprinting at the cellular level, as well as to develop complex 3D constructs in a high-throughput manner. As an evolving bioprinting modality, DBB has greatly advanced our understanding of cell interactions, tissue and organ formation, and human disease. This Primer gives an overview of the methodology of DBB, detailing its various modalities and its associated hardware and software, including the selection of bioinks and substrates, as well as their interactions and compatibility with different DBB sub-modalities. Finally, recent advances and several limitations of DBB are summarized and considerations are discussed for potential improvements to the technology in the future.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.