Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMC

Droplet-based bioprinting

Gupta D., Derman ID., Xu C., Huang Y., Ozbolat IT.

Laboratory Study, published in Nat Rev Methods Primers (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Nat Rev Methods Primers (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41878399
PMCID
PMC13007925
DOI
10.1038/s43586-025-00394-y
Citations
10

Abstract (original English)

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting facilitates the automated patterning of biological entities (such as cells and tissue building blocks) with or without scaffolding biomaterials. The technique enables fabrication of highly organized structures that recapitulate the physiological and biological functions of native tissues. Droplet-based bioprinting (DBB) is unique among the existing bioprinting modalities in its ability to handle and manipulate bioprinting at the cellular level, as well as to develop complex 3D constructs in a high-throughput manner. As an evolving bioprinting modality, DBB has greatly advanced our understanding of cell interactions, tissue and organ formation, and human disease. This Primer gives an overview of the methodology of DBB, detailing its various modalities and its associated hardware and software, including the selection of bioinks and substrates, as well as their interactions and compatibility with different DBB sub-modalities. Finally, recent advances and several limitations of DBB are summarized and considerations are discussed for potential improvements to the technology in the future.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.